vostok
Blooming
- User ID
- 156
Things have gotten a lot cheaper since I tried 3d printing years back, then it was an expensive trial making pc fan cowls, a quick search on the web sees many new creations even just for the weed
Petg would be better for a bong. More temp and chemical resistant as well as food safe. Would require so mods for most cheap printers as it needs a slightly hotter bed and nozzle temp
3D printers are gaining in popularity, with uses spanning the spectrum from moon bases to firearms, but there's another area where the ability to construct complex shapes is beginning to provide benefits: getting high.
Online magazine Motherboard has published the story about the slow but inevitable rise of 3D-printed bongs. MakerBot's Thingiverse site returns almost two dozen template results when searching for "bong," all of which are downloadable in STL format and printable on tons of different 3D printers.
Common resin-based 3D printers can't create glass, so a water pipe produced from these templates wouldn't be entirely print-n-toke, but most appear to be ready to go as soon as glass pipes are added. The descriptions for many of the pipes indicate that they should be printed with PLA, which the Ice Bong creator notes "is biodegradable and poses no health risk and also has no smell."
Questions of convenience aside, the 3D printing of what could be called "drug paraphernalia" raises an interesting set of issues which parallel those raised by firearms printing. As marijuana legalization gains traction at the state level, what is the responsibility of 3D repositories like Thingiverse to police themselves? Is it "moral" to allow the storing and downloading of 3D bong templates but not firearm templates? Casual marijuana smokers consistently tout the harmlessness of the drug, but those opposed to its legalization point to the dangers of abuse; on the opposite side of that coin, firearm enthusiasts push their own hobby's safety and the dangers of restricting gun ownership. Each group may be seen by the other as somewhat hypocritical: a gun is a tool, but gun control proponents point out that guns are tools designed to kill.
Moral issues aside, 3D printing lowers barriers to construction and actually lowers far more barriers for firearm creation than for bong creation—it's a lot harder and more expensive to buy a gun than to buy a bong, and there are legal issues around gun ownership that 3D printing can circumvent. It's not illegal to purchase an "unlicensed" bong (though you might get tossed out of the head shop if you can't stop asking the clerk how high the bong will get you), but would fast access to a 3D printer and a template really encourage drug use?
From a purely practical perspective, the answer right now is "no," if only because a bong isn't necessary to use marijuana. Though 3D printing might lower the entry barrier to procuring a bong (especially if you're under 18 in the USA and can't purchase one), actually having a 3D printer itself is quite a barrier. This is reflected by the download numbers for the bong templates on Thingiverse: as Motherboard notes, the IceBong's download count of 789 isn't exactly "disruptive." But as 3D printing matures, the technology may become exactly that. Scanners and copiers today include methods to prevent them from counterfeiting currency; it's conceivable that legal mandates might spring up to encourage 3D printer manufacturers to ensure their devices don't print "illegal" or "immoral" patterns.
In other words, now would probably be a good time to get your 3D bong on, before the man steps in and harshes your mellow.HERE:
Where there's a gap in the market, is old plastics sets for old dirt bikes. Just for instance, a complete plastics kit for my old dirt bike would be 2k upwards, and then I'd have to very fortunate to find a complete set.
Fortunately, I have a complete set, but I'm seriously thinking I might want to get the pieces scanned, before they're fucked altogether (plastic is breaking down).
Your right, I did all metal before I ever used mine so I forget about that.personally I wouldn’t be using pla for anything that’s touching nutrients. It’s not chem safe and could leach into the nutrient solution of your worried about that shit.
And yeah you can print petg on a standard ender but I wouldn’t be doing it for too long or you risk the ptfe lined throat degrading (fumes from ptfe are deadly) so well worth upgrading to an all metal hotend.
Yeah pla is kinda food safe but most foods don’t really have the amount of salts that nutrients do. The main issue with leaching is the Chems used to actually colour the pla as there’s no real standard for what the colouring agent could be. But yeah agree with the misconception that it’s biodegradable because its derived from starch, some brands (not many) are biodegradable but only in industrial composting. Landfill, home compost etc it’s just plastic.Your right, I did all metal before I ever used mine so I forget about that.
I would not be too worried about pla, it seems to be considered absolutely safe and people have been having plenty of success in hydro and aquariums, there is a bit of a misconception that it is biodegradable because it is made from starch but it is really only degradable with PVA.
I guess it depends how far you want to go, ASA can be good safe but most ASA filaments aren't, without heavy UV I think all of the above would be safe to useASA is the go for parts that are subjected to light and water.
PLA will be attacked by both, petg is ok with water but light will attack it
I tend to agree..I guess it depends how far you want to go, ASA can be good safe but most ASA filaments aren't, without heavy UV I think all of the above would be safe to use