New Camera and upload error.

MM2K6

Baked
Community Member
User ID
7691
can't you adjust the camera settings to lower the res of the pic you take to save you the edit step ?
No camera settings changed at all only can change res to low medium or high! no shit, just opened in paint and noticed it was 8000x8000 so i clicked resize and put it to 50 instead of 100 saved it so 4000x4000 and it worked fine :unsure:

This is a cheap camera 64mp 4k ....
 

Please join our community to continue reading

Forgot your password?
Don't have an account? Register now
or

HomeBound_Hound

Baked
Community Member
User ID
455
No camera settings changed at all only can change res to low medium or high! no shit, just opened in paint and noticed it was 8000x8000 so i clicked resize and put it to 50 instead of 100 saved it so 4000x4000 and it worked fine :unsure:

This is a cheap camera 64mp 4k ....
Most systems won't accept 8000x8000
It's a server end dimension cap
8000x8000 is huge
 

HomeBound_Hound

Baked
Community Member
User ID
455
Most systems won't accept 8000x8000
It's a server end dimension cap
8000x8000 is huge
The sites already buggy as hell could ya imagine the work load on the servers CPU n RAM if everyone starts uploading and forcing the server to convert images the size of a football field
Digital camera. will try my phone. just uninstall windows updates from today... trying some more
(y)
View attachment 73467
This explains it just gets messy in the syntax
The servers saying its uploaded Ur image but failed to process it and as ya mentioned its to do with the watermark
8000x8000 image roughly 64m pixels uses hundreds of Mb of ram just to process the image
PHP limit is probably closer to 128mb maybe 256mb (xenforo uses PHP)
So it's the server not ya camera
If the backend was setup properly this wouldn't of come through as a stack trace explosion should've been a neat error saying file to large
giphy - 2026-05-14T113858.425.gif
 

MM2K6

Baked
Community Member
User ID
7691
besides that regardless of the 8000x8000 the files are small 7 to 11 mb so not size, it's the pixels that screw it. to many dots! per mm :ROFLMAO: if you drag and drop you can see it in the website then it errors opps blabla it's the watermark part that screws it, the extension php they use. I didin't look at it properly to be honest..
 

MM2K6

Baked
Community Member
User ID
7691
all they really need to do is run the website local host and then try upload the picture, before it's compiled and uploaded. It will error and then see the coding and what the fuck line 78 is up to :) guessing they use some website builder not real coding :unsure:
 

HomeBound_Hound

Baked
Community Member
User ID
455
besides that regardless of the 8000x8000 the files are small 7 to 11 mb so not size, it's the pixels that screw it. to many dots! per mm :ROFLMAO: if you drag and drop you can see it in the website then it errors opps blabla it's the watermark part that screws it, the extension php they use. I didin't look at it properly to be honest..
Yeah conversion or image processing runs on pixel so 64M pixels × 3–4 bytes per pixel ≈ 200–300MB+ RAM
Then adding watermarking ontop of that...
So a relatively small file can still use a fair amount of processing power 🔋
 

MM2K6

Baked
Community Member
User ID
7691
Yeah conversion or image processing runs on pixel so 64M pixels × 3–4 bytes per pixel ≈ 200–300MB+ RAM
Then adding watermarking ontop of that...
So a relatively small file can still use a fair amount of processing power 🔋
Hook the server to starlink :ROFLMAO: and up your data out, it's always shitty, they give ya good in. (y)

Do TSE have their own server? it's much better little traffic compare to paid running a million site off a pissy server
 

MM2K6

Baked
Community Member
User ID
7691
Apache server with php and sql and all the the other crap installed, and a good connection then you have full control of you very own server. just set apache dns and name servers.

This is resolved for me anyway now.. (y)
 
Top Bottom